wouldcatchit: THEY'RE ALLOWED (WEAPONS AREN'T ONLY WELCOMED)

[personal profile] wouldcatchit 2016-01-18 05:18 pm (UTC)(link)
Public Intoxication. [A scoff.

Plenty of laws were dumb, but, even to guy that usually didn't drink, charging somebody for being drunk in public sounded especially so. (The other charges sounded fine with him. The fraud was especially helpful for confirming a bias.) But. Still. Public intoxication. What was the worst thing anyone had done, while drunk in public? Punched a few people, maybe? Only seemed worth enforcing if children or little old people were hurt. (Ooh. Wait. Did this Quill do such a thing?

No. Hitters of the elderly and youth had a certain...air about them. Well, not exactly an air. More like a vibe. A certain kind of spirit. This Quill's soul did not give off such an impression.)
] You had heard about me. The only crime they've got me for was attacking the Accuser's associates without the government's permission. [There's a hint of bitterness in that tone. A tone that pretty much insists you don't ask about the other crimes he didn't get charged for.

Well. Only felt fair to share that, since this Peter did. Time to see if he could change the subject!
] Your charge of fraud. It was for taxes, or something more interesting?
wouldcatchit: I HATE YOU TOO (I HATE YOU BATISTA)

[personal profile] wouldcatchit 2016-01-18 11:40 pm (UTC)(link)
[Letting a guy think I was someone I wasn't...letting him hand over a whole lot of cash? Yes. This did sound like a very efficient con-man. One-hundred percent not an imbecile. This 'Peter Quill', whoever he truly was, would be useful, as an ally, against the Accuser. El Durante resettled himself and, without looking away, he explained himself as frankly as he was able.

Which, you know, was really, really frank. Dunno how you measure a thing like that accurately, but it'd be off the charts. In a manner of speaking. Not a literal one, of course. Unless they developed some sort of Geiger counter of abstract conce--oh, never mind.
] It is a matter of principle. The only figure of authority that I've ever respected was my father. To continue doing what I was, before I was arrested, under the orders of people that I distrust is against my personal standards.

You must be getting something out of this. [Not a question. A very figuratively plain-faced assumption.] Something that would make it amendable to serve these bureaucratic, pencil-pushing fools. [A brief nod, to the two-way glass pane. You know. As if Quill needed clarification.] It is blackmail. Or information, perhaps.
wouldcatchit: AND HUGGING FAT GIRLS (KEEP ON KISSING BABIES)

[personal profile] wouldcatchit 2016-01-19 04:45 am (UTC)(link)
[...pity, that his involvement was for something so petty. But, it was understandable. It would be conducive for a con-man to have a clean record, to have a new, ripe opportunity to act as he would.

The arms were lowered and his hands were folded in front of him, on the table.
] I may change my name, sometimes, but I know who I am and I know what I've experienced and committed; I don't need a legal entity to forgive what I've done. [Utterly no hint of remorse, in that tone.It's not that he's forgiven himself. No. Not at all.] Peter Quill. Do you believe that there is good and evil?

[Yes. This was exactly what normal people small-talked about. Rap-sheets and morality. Aw yeah.]
wouldcatchit: (YEEEAAAAAHHHHHHHH)

[personal profile] wouldcatchit 2016-01-21 11:18 pm (UTC)(link)
[El Durante dabbled in whatever he needed to, to get what he wantedunless it got innocent people hurt and/or killed. Consider this question something of a means, to further his character-study. He listened without blinking, and then shared his piece.] I'd agree only partly. There is evil in this world. Undoubtedly, good must also exist, to balance the first. I think good often takes the form of belief, of people wishing to find heroes and worthwhile endeavors.

[His hands were separated and palms opened, as if to say, I have no hidden agendas here.] As you've opined, I also think that morality is relative. Two people can look at the same thing, and one can insist it's good while the other would disagree.

But I have a feeling we'd agree that the Accuser is undoubtedly evil, and, if we took him down, it would not make us anything definitely good. Only technically good. [A very cold statement of fact. Correct him if he was wrong.] This is not atonement; this is assassination that we're signing up for.
Edited (Wrong word. Haha. Kind of literally.) 2016-01-21 23:29 (UTC)